Implied Contract in Employment Law

 Implied contracts exist in at-will employment states along with the potential for the company or the employee to sever the working relationship at any time for nearly any reason. However, there are certain complications to the implied contract with the employment laws where the business entity could face litigation.

With an at-will employment in place as an implied contract, the employee may terminate his or her association for any or no reason. It is generally acceptable to give a two-week notice, but this is a courtesy and may provide a recommendation for the next job. The employer must obey the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Civil Rights Act and remain in line with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Any violation of the acts and protected classifications could lead to a lawsuit against the company for discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination. It is generally essential to hire a lawyer for these matters to proceed in the courtroom or through a settlement.
What is the Implied Contract?
An Implied contract usually occurs through a written presumption of employment or through an oral agreement of hiring from an employer or representative of the company. These matters generally cement through an oral contract that becomes a written contract of employment or through an employee handbook. Some employees sign employment paperwork through the initial training period or with policies and written assurances that the employer will provide at some point in the first few weeks or months of work. The implied contract then creates the working relationship between the individual and the company that may progress to promotion, changing positions and raises with continued wages.
Suggestions and Exceptions to Implied Contracts
The employment between worker and company usually has no true contract other than an implied agreement through various pieces of documentation. However, because the contract is not implicit but implied, numerous suggestions are possible to change the circumstances. These could affect job security, alter procedures and even cause adverse conditions to the employment agreement. The suggestions also may progress into an employment contract as an implied agreement. This could prevent termination when the employer suggests a length of time for the job. Then, the individual may have a legal claim if wrongful termination happens at some point later.

Courts in the United States find that the employee handbooks and various papers signed by the employee constitute an implied contract between the worker and employer. Without a waiver, the guidelines and policies that the company enacts do not create contractual rights. The exemptions to standard at will termination happen when the provisions in these documents imply that the employee will only face discipline or termination for just cause or with only specific circumstances. Termination in any other situation may remain open for legal recourse. These provisions provide the employee with greater job security and difficulty for the employer in firing the person.
At-Will Employment Complications
When the implied contract is part of employment with workers, the at-will stipulation of the state laws for employment does not always hold true. The complications arise when the employer wants to fire so many employees or someone with a specific implied contract. While the handbook, documents signed and even the policy manuals may not say that a contract exists, the conditions and guidelines may imply a contractual obligation between employee and company. The binding limits of the employment may require a judge to consider the implications of the implied contract. The courts will look at all the evidence to make the final decision over these matters.

Weighing all the factors is essential. Reviewing the at will versus the implied contract is crucial so that the right decision takes over the matter between the company and employee. The wording of paperwork may even stipulate an at-will circumstance, but all the factors may point to an implied contract such as salary obligations, reasons for termination and a start and end date of employment. These matters are more important than the words of at will within the documentation to the courts. An at-will policy may not supersede implied contract agreement terms.

Legal Support for Implied Contract Employment
 
If the employee faces termination for at will rules with the company but has an agreement that expresses an implied contract, he or she should hire a lawyer to determine if the claim is valid. The language and all surrounding factors may point to an implied contract that requires upholding by the company.

Share:

Read More

Transfer of Ownership Options for a Small Business

When the owner of a business wants to retire or transfer the ownership to a family member, it is important to have a valid and comprehensive succession plan in order to sell or transfer the company to another person. To accomplish this feat, the owner may need the services of a business lawyer and other professionals to assess the business.

There are many business owners that plan for the transfer of ownership from the start and formation of the company. However, others must research this matter before retiring or attempting to sell the business to another person. Some individuals may choose to sell the assets, while others will decide to sell the property or the name of the company instead of the entire entity. It is important to determine how to transfer the ownership. If the owner wants to process this through a partner, when there are additional owners, or through a company transfer, he or she will need to determine the best way to accomplish his or her goal.

The Various Ways of Transferring Ownership
 
It is possible to transfer the ownership of a business in multiple ways or through a business succession plan. The owner will need to determine the specific factors of the company. If there are shareholders, partners, other owners or other elements, the transfer will require certain procedures. However, if he or she is the sole owner, it is possible to add a partner. The individual could process the sale through a limited liability company or with a corporation. The procedure may entail a financing situation, a leasing or transferring to family. Each way will need a different set of paperwork and processes.

There are many business owners that plan for the transfer of ownership from the start and formation of the company. However, others must research this matter before retiring or attempting to sell the business to another person. Some individuals may choose to sell the assets, while others will decide to sell the property or the name of the company instead of the entire entity. It is important to determine how to transfer the ownership. If the owner wants to process this through a partner, when there are additional owners, or through a company transfer, he or she will need to determine the best way to accomplish his or her goal.

The Various Ways of Transferring Ownership
 
It is possible to transfer the ownership of a business in multiple ways or through a business succession plan. The owner will need to determine the specific factors of the company. If there are shareholders, partners, other owners or other elements, the transfer will require certain procedures. However, if he or she is the sole owner, it is possible to add a partner. The individual could process the sale through a limited liability company or with a corporation. The procedure may entail a financing situation, a leasing or transferring to family. Each way will need a different set of paperwork and processes.

Share:

Read More

Initial Coin Offerings on the Blockchain: How to Deal with Legal Challenges

The laws of the jurisdiction of the country where a Company is incorporated and from which an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) Launch was performed is the relevant law governing the Project Launch.
The laws of the jurisdiction referred to by a Company in its White Paper as well as the laws of any other jurisdiction in which the Token issued could be considered as having been offered or sold or in which such activity could be deemed to have been carried out would also be relevant to the Project Launch .

Legal Challenges 
Legal challenges arise for any Company involved in a coin offering especially if an ICO targets investors globally.

A number of token offerings to date have involved an entity incorporated or established in the Cayman Islands, Gibraltar, Singapore, Switzerland, the UK or the US. There are many factors that drive the choice of jurisdiction, which vary on a case-by-case basis.
A burning question we are frequently asked is whether any law other than that of the jurisdiction of incorporation of the entity generating or offering the tokens is required to be considered in relation to a token offering and our answer is always in the affirmative.

In addition to the laws of the jurisdiction in which the entity issuing or generating the tokens is incorporated or established, the laws of each jurisdiction within which the tokens could be considered to be offered or sold, or in which a regulated activity may be deemed to be carried out, will also be relevant.

Most jurisdictions regulate the conditions under which certain investments may be offered within that jurisdiction. There are also generally restrictions on the ability of certain persons to carry out certain (regulated) activities in relation to such investments, or which submit the carrying out of such activities to conditions (such as licensing or authorisation requirements).

A company could be classified as having carried out a token sale activity in several jurisdictions not limited to the country which was the seat of its incorporation and the laws of the various jurisdictions would be relevant to the project subject to the terms and conditions of the documentation provided by the Company in its token offering.

Relevant documentation and applications including the White Paper, Business Plan, Token Acquisition Agreement, github repositories, smart contracts have to be adequately prepared and applied to ensure functionality and compliance with the laws in the relevant jurisdictions of the Project Launch.

In other jurisdictions, the token issued may be classified as an investment which will include the token being classified as a security token. Such investment activity is regulated activity whereas in other jurisdictions, the token may be classified as a utility token which is not regulated. A utility token is generally not regulated as it is not considered as investment activity. Some jurisdictions may however, consider a token as a hybrid utility token as well as a security token and the token issuer would be carrying out a regulated activity contrary to the Securities Laws in the jurisdiction if the token issuer is not appropriately licensed to carry out investment activity which is generally regulated.

Conclusion

It is important that Companies that intend to undertake a coin offering take appropriate legal advice before embarking on the Token Project Launch in order not to fall foul of regulations in various jurisdictions.

In the event you are a Company wishing to launch a token offering or you are a token acquirer who has suffered a loss, please feel free to contact us and we can assist.

Share:

Read More